Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Attitudes of Bavarian bovine veterinarians towards pain and pain management in cattle
  1. Theresa Tschoner1,
  2. Carola Sauter-Louis1,2,
  3. Verena Peinhofer1 and
  4. Melanie Feist1
  1. 1Clinic for Ruminants with Ambulatory and Herd Health Services at the Centre for Clinical Veterinary Medicine, LMU Munich, Oberschleissheim, Germany
  2. 2Institute of Epidemiology (IfE), Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut, Greifswald–Insel Riems, Germany
  1. Correspondence to Dr Theresa Tschoner, Clinic for Ruminants with Ambulatory and Herd Health Services at the Centre for Clinical Veterinary Medicine, LMU Munich, 85764 Oberschleißheim, Germany; t.tschoner{at}med.vetmed.uni-muenchen.de

Abstract

Background Pain recognition in cattle is difficult, but the control and treatment of pain are essential for animal welfare. Pain evaluation depends on the observer’s experience and opinion, resulting in different approaches towards pain and the use of analgesics.

Methods A questionnaire to assess the attitudes of veterinarians towards pain and pain management in cattle was sent to 1097 bovine practitioners in Bavaria. Out of 287 returned questionnaires, 274 could be analysed.

Results Claw amputation, extirpation of the eye bulb and caesarean section were considered to be the most painful procedures in adult cattle, and castration, umbilical surgery and laparotomy in calves. Orthopaedic diseases like bone fractures or arthritis were estimated to be the most painful conditions in both cattle and calves, and ileus and meningitis in calves. Female veterinarians scored pain higher than their male colleagues. Even though 75.5 per cent of veterinarians stated that they used analgesics adequately, pain management during surgery was low, especially for castration and dehorning in calves.

Conclusion Bavarian bovine veterinarians differ in their opinions about pain in cattle and the results of this study indicate that there a mismatch between their use of analgesics and the pain scores they awarded.

  • analgesia
  • calves
  • dairy cattle
  • surveys
View Full Text

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • Funding This project was funded by the Bavarian Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Forestry (4200.0207.8210), Boehringer Ingelheim (4200.0207.8201), Pfizer (4200.0207.8194) and Merial (4200.0207.8176).

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

  • Data availability statement All data relevant to the study are included in the article or uploaded as supplementary information.

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.