Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Isolation of dermatophytes from dogs and cats in the South of England between 1991 and 2017
  1. Sarah Long1,
  2. Hope Carveth1,
  3. Yu-Mei Chang2,
  4. Dan O’Neill1 and
  5. Ross Bond1
  1. 1Clinical Science and Services, Royal Veterinary College, Hatfield, UK
  2. 2Research Support Office, Royal Veterinary College, London, UK
  1. Correspondence to Prof Ross Bond, Clinical Science and Services, Royal Veterinary College, North Mymms, Hertfordshire, United Kingdom; rbond{at}rvc.ac.uk
  • Present affiliation The present affiliation of Hope Carveth is: Cheshire Pet, Cheshire, UK

Abstract

Background Since the epidemiology of canine and feline dermatophytosis might evolve in response to chronological, sociological and ecological factors, the authors studied the occurrence of dermatophyte pathogens over 27 years subsequent to the last major UK survey.

Methods Dermatophyte culture submission records from dogs and cats to the Royal Veterinary College Diagnostic Laboratory in England between 1991 and 2017 were reviewed. Samples were routinely cultured aerobically at 26°C for up to four weeks on Sabouraud’s dextrose agar containing cycloheximide and chloramphenicol; dermatophytes were identified using conventional phenotypic methods.

Results Proportional isolation from cats (15.9 per cent of 1389) exceeded that of dogs (8.1 per cent of 2193) (P<0.001). Together, Microsporum canis and Trichophyton mentagrophytes accounted for 91.9 per cent (n=203) and 80.2 per cent (n=142) of isolations from cats and dogs, respectively. M canis was more frequently (P<0.001) isolated from cats and dogs under two years of age. Dermatophytes were more frequent (P≤0.001) in samples from first-opinion rather than referral practice, and from Jack Russell and Yorkshire terriers and from Persian and chinchilla cats (P≤0.002).

Conclusions M canis and T mentagrophytes remain the most common agents of canine and feline dermatophytosis in the South of England; continued clinical vigilance is required.

  • dermatophytosis
  • dogs
  • cats
  • epidemiology
  • Trichophyton
  • Microsporum
View Full Text

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • Contributors SL and HC collated the data, which were analysed by SL, HC and RB. SL and RB wrote the paper with input and revision from HC, DON and Y-MC; in particular, DON and YM-C contributed to the epidemiological and statistical aspects of the manuscript, respectively. RB conceived, supervised and coordinated each step of the project and submitted the manuscript.

  • Funding This project was self-funded.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Ethics approval This retrospective study of archived data was approved by the Royal Veterinary College’s Social Science Research Ethical Review Board (URN SR2017-1039).

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

  • Data availability statement All data relevant to the study are included in the article or uploaded as supplementary information.

  • Author note Hope Carveth: Cheshire Pet, Cheshire, UK

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.