Article Text

other Versions

PDF
Commercial porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV)-2 modified live virus vaccine against heterologous single and dual Korean PRRSV-1 and PRRSV-2 challenge
  1. Jiwoon Jeong,
  2. Seeun Kim,
  3. Changhoon Park,
  4. Kee Hwan Park,
  5. Ikjae Kang,
  6. Su-Jin Park and
  7. Chanhee Chae
  1. Department of Veterinary Pathology, Seoul National University, College of Veterinary Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
  1. E-mail for correspondence; swine{at}snu.ac.kr

Abstract

This study evaluated porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV)-2 modified live virus (MLV) vaccine against heterologous single and dual challenge of Korean PRRSV-1 and PRRSV-2. Pigs were administered PRRSV-2 MLV vaccine intramuscularly at 21 days of age and inoculated intranasally with both genotypes at 56 days of age. Vaccination of pigs with PRRSV-2 MLV vaccine resulted in reduction of viral loads of both PRRSV-1 and PRRSV-2 after heterologous single and dual challenge with PRRSV-1 and PRRSV-2. In addition, pigs vaccinated with PRRSV-2 MLV vaccine exhibited higher frequencies of PRRSV-1 and PRRSV-2 specific interferon-γ secreting cells (IFN-γ-SC) and showed a significant reduction in lung lesions and PRRSV nucleic acid within the lung lesions after single and dual challenge compared with unvaccinated challenged pigs. Taken together these results demonstrated that vaccination of pigs with PRRSV-2 is efficacious in protecting growing pigs from respiratory disease against heterologous single and dual PRRSV-1 and PRRSV-2 challenge.

  • co-infection
  • genotype
  • porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome (prrs)
  • vaccine

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • Funding The author’s research was supported by contract research funds (Grant no. 550- 20160084) of the Research Institute for Veterinary Science (RIVS) from the College of Veterinary Medicine and by the BK 21 Plus Program (Grant no. 5260-20150100) for Creative Veterinary Science Research.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Ethics approval All of the methods were previously approved by the Seoul National University Institutional Animal Care and Use, and Ethics Committee.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.