Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Influence of living in a multicat household on health and behaviour in a cohort of cats from the United Kingdom
Free
  1. Claire Roberts1,
  2. Tim Gruffydd-Jones1,
  3. Jessica L Williams1 and
  4. Jane K Murray1,2
  1. 1 Bristol Veterinary School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
  2. 2 Cohort Studies Team, Dogs Trust, London, UK
  1. Correspondence to Claire Roberts; claire.e.roberts{at}bristol.ac.uk

Abstract

Background Living in a multicat household has been implicated as a risk factor for various feline issues, but evidence is often anecdotal or based on retrospective studies.

Methods Data from the Bristol Cats Study, a UK longitudinal study of pet cats, were used. Cats were included if they had remained in either a single cat or multicat household between questionnaires 1 (two months old to four months old) and 5 (two-and-a-half years old). Univariable and multivariable logistic regression models were used to analyse associations between single cat/multicat households and measures of health and behaviour (overweight/obesity, abscesses/cat bites, negative interactions with owner and periuria). Multicat households were also subcategorised according to whether owners had reported agonistic behaviour between household cats.

Results There was no evidence of association between household type and the likelihood of obesity, abscesses or periuria. The likelihood of negative interactions with the owner (eg, growling or hissing) was influenced by the cats’ relationships; cats in non-agonistic multicat households had decreased odds of negative interactions with the owner, compared with single and agonistic multicat households (P<0.001).

Conclusion Living in a multicat households per se was not a risk factor for the health and behaviour issues investigated, but the intercat relationship is important.

  • cats
  • aggression
  • behaviour
  • epidemiology
  • human-animal interactions
  • welfare
View Full Text

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • Funding Zoetis funded CR post. Cats Protection funded JKM post. The WALTHAM Centre for Pet Nutrition fund administrative support for the Bristol Cats Study.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

  • Data availability statement All data relevant to the study are included in the article or uploaded as supplementary information.

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.