Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Women in veterinary leadership positions: their motivations and enablers
  1. Charlotte Tindell1,
  2. Renate Weller1 and
  3. Tierney Kinnison2
  1. 1 Equine Hospital, Royal Veterinary College, Hatfield, UK
  2. 2 The LIVE Centre, Royal Veterinary College, Hatfield, UK
  1. Correspondence to Dr Tierney Kinnison; tkinnison{at}


Background Despite now having higher numbers of women than men within the veterinary profession, there are substantially less women in leadership roles. Research, primarily in other professions, has focussed on barriers to leadership and sometimes overlooked facilitators and motivators. This study aimed to explore the motivating factors for female veterinary surgeons to become leaders, to identify potential strategies to increase female leadership.

Methods Sixteen female leaders from academia, professional bodies, industry and clinical practice took part in semistructured interviews. Interviews were analysed using a thematic analysis approach.

Results Two themes were developed: ‘Potential for positive influence’ and ‘Requirement of external enablers’. Participants wanted to influence change for themselves, including work-life balance and developing their role, and for others through a position of influence. They wanted to inspire and mentor the future generation of leaders. External enablers allowed this transition to occur, including formal mentors and informal support systems, opportunities for growth and increased responsibility, and leadership training.

Conclusion Potential strategies to increase female leaders include the promotion of female role models, increasing awareness of training and increasing work flexibility. The profession could improve its support of the next generation of leaders and celebrate the successful female leaders we already possess.

  • female
  • women in the veterinary profession
  • leadership
  • qualitative research
View Full Text

Statistics from


  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Ethics approval The project received ethical approval from the Social Science Research Ethical Review Board at the Royal Veterinary College (URN SR2017-1405).

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

  • Data availability statement No data are available.

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.