Article Text

Pet owners’ perceptions of veterinary safety practices
  1. Heather Fowler1,
  2. Bianca Irimia1,
  3. Vickie Ramirez1,
  4. Hendrika Meischke1,2 and
  5. Peter Rabinowitz1
  1. 1Department of Occupational and Environmental Health Sciences, School of Public Health, Center for One Health Research (COHR), University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
  2. 2University of Washington, Department of Health Services, School of Public Health, Seattle, Washington, USA
  1. E-mail for correspondence; hnfowler{at}


Veterinary workers must care for their animal patients while simultaneously protecting their own health and safety. This process can be complicated by the presence and perception of pet owners who may not agree with a given tactic used to protect veterinary workers from injury. We conducted focus groups of pet owners in the Seattle area during November 2016 to gain a deeper understanding of their perceptions relating to veterinary worker safety practices. Focus group interviews were recorded and transcribed and study themes identified and summarised. Twenty pet owners participated in three focus groups. Study themes arising from the focus group discussions could be categorised into human, animal, behavioural and environmental domains as outlined in a One Health Occupational Safety and Health (OHOSH) model. Communication was a recurring study theme identified, suggesting that lacking or impaired veterinary personnel-client communication plays a key role in the safe delivery of veterinary services and can negatively impact the use of safety practices among veterinary personnel. Our study suggests that it is important for veterinary personnel to communicate to clients the reasons for policies related to worker safety. Such communication can help engage the veterinary client in order to effectively avoid situations that precipitate injury.

  • pet owner
  • occupational injuries
  • pets
  • safety

Statistics from


  • Funding Research reported in this publication was supported in part by the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences of the National Institutes of Health under award number T32ES015459, The Bullitt Foundation Environmental Health Fellowship and the Medical Aid and Accident Fund (UW/L&I).

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent Not required.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.