Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Effect of delivery method on the efficacy of Salmonella vaccination in chickens
  1. R. J. Atterbury, BSc, PhD, CBiol1,
  2. V. Morris, MSc, PhD1,
  3. D. Harrison1,
  4. V. Tucker1,
  5. V. M. Allen, PhD, FIBMS1,
  6. R. H. Davies, BVSc, PhD, MRCVS2 and
  7. J. J. Carrique-Mas, DVM, MSc, PhD, MRCVS2
  1. 1 Department of Clinical Veterinary Science, University of Bristol, Langford, Bristol BS40 5DU
  2. 2 Department of Food and Environmental Safety, Veterinary Laboratories Agency - Weybridge, Woodham Lane, New Haw, Addlestone, Surrey KT15 3NB


To investigate whether the efficacy of live vaccines is influenced by the mode of vaccine delivery, a widely-used UK live commercial Salmonella Enteritidis vaccine was delivered to pullet chicks either by spray, in drinking water, or in combination with a bivalent vaccine containing inactivated Salmonella Enteritidis and Salmonella Typhimurium. The birds were subsequently challenged with 102 or 108 colony-forming units (cfu) of Salmonella Enteritidis through drinking water at either six or 20 weeks of age. Ten days after the challenge, the birds were euthanased and their caecal contents cultured for Salmonella. All of the vaccinated groups contained fewer Salmonella Enteritidis-positive birds than the unvaccinated groups. The ‘spray-vaccinated’ group contained significantly fewer Salmonella Enteritidis-positive birds than the ‘water-vaccinated’ group after challenge with 108 cfu at 20 weeks. However, there was little or no difference at the other challenge time points between the groups that received vaccine through different modes of delivery.

View Full Text

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.