Article Text

PDF
Effects of hetastarch 130/0.4 on plasma osmolality, colloid osmotic pressure and total protein in horses anaesthetised for elective surgical procedures
  1. Shannon Roska1,
  2. Samantha Morello1,
  3. Victoria Rajamanickam2 and
  4. Lesley J Smith1
  1. 1Department of Surgical Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
  2. 2Department of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, School of Medicine and Public Health, Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
  1. E-mail for correspondence; sam.morello{at}wisc.edu

Abstract

Effects of lactated Ringer’s solution (LRS) and hetastarch 130/0.4 (HES) on colloid osmotic pressure (COP), plasma osmolality (OSM) and total protein (TP) were investigated in 18 inhalational-anaesthetised healthy horses. Horses received 4–6 ml/kg LRS (LRS; n=9) or HES (HES; n=9) from anaesthesia induction through 60 min, after which all were administered LRS. COP, TP and OSM were measured before premedication (baseline), postinduction and 30 (n=18), 60 (n=18), 90 (n=18) and 120 (n=12) minutes. Baseline COP, OSM and TP were not different between groups. TP decreased in both groups at all time points after induction. OSM increased from baseline in HES at 30, 60, 90 and 120 minutes. COP decreased at 30–120 minutes in LRS, and at 90 and 120 minutes in HES. Mean COP was higher in HES than LRS at 30 (18.8±0.5 vs 16.3±0.4 mmHg (P=0.001)), 60 (19.1±0.5 vs 15.9±0.4 mmHg (P<0.0001)) and 90 (17.4±0.5 vs 15.4±0.5 mmHg (P=0.005)) minutes. Sixty minutes of HES infusion increases OSM and transiently maintains COP compared with an equal volume of LRS in anaesthetised horses.

  • anaesthesia
  • blood pressure
  • fluid therapy
  • horses

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • Contributors SR: design, data collection, preparation of manuscript; SM: design, data analysis, preparation of manuscript; VR: data analysis (statistics); LJS: design, data collection, data analysis, preparation of manuscript.

  • Funding This study was funded in part by Abbott Animal Health.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Ethics approval The experimental protocol was approved by the University of Wisconsin’s Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.