Article Text

PDF
Late-onset recurrence of neurological deficits after surgery for spinal arachnoid diverticula
  1. Emili Alcoverro1,
  2. James Fraser McConnell1,
  3. Daniel Sanchez-Masian1,
  4. Luisa De Risio2,
  5. Steven De Decker3 and
  6. Rita Gonçalves1
  1. 1Institute of Veterinary Science, Small Animal Teaching Hospital, University of Liverpool, Neston, UK
  2. 2Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, The Animal Health Trust, Suffolk, UK
  3. 3Department of Clinical Science and Services, Royal Veterinary College, University of London, Hatfield, UK
  1. E-mail for correspondence; r.goncalves{at}liv.ac.uk

Abstract

Spinal cord dysfunction secondary to spinal arachnoid diverticula (SAD) has been widely reported in the veterinary literature and there is some suggestion that surgical treatment may provide better outcomes than medical treatment. Despite this, previous reports have mentioned cases with recurrence of clinical signs following surgical treatment but the cause for this has not been further investigated. The medical records of seven dogs and one cat which presented for investigation of recurrence of neurological deficits at least six months after surgery for SAD were retrospectively reviewed. Median time to relapse of the neurological deficits was 20.5 months after surgery. On repeated imaging, 3/8 cases showed clear regrowth of diverticulum, 2/8 cases showed dorsal compression at the previous laminectomy site (presumed to be the laminectomy membrane), and 3/8 cases showed herniation of the spinal cord through the laminectomy defect associated with a stellate appearance to the spinal cord with small multiloculated areas of dilation of the subarachnoid space. Repeat surgical intervention was most successful in the cases where SAD recurrence was identified while medical treatment resulted in either subtle improvement or stabilisation on the clinical signs, sometimes followed by slow deterioration.

  • magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
  • surgery
  • spinal arachnoid diverticula

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.