Article Text

PDF
Profile of pig farms combining high performance and low antimicrobial usage within four European countries
  1. Lucie Collineau, DVM, PhD, DipECVPH1,2,
  2. Annette Backhans, DVM, PhD3,
  3. Jeroen Dewulf, DVM, PhD, DipECVPH, DipECPHM4,
  4. Ulf Emanuelson, PhD, DipECVPH3,
  5. Elisabeth grosse Beilage, DrMedVet, DVM, PhD, DipECPHM5,
  6. Anne Lehébel, PhD6,
  7. Svenja Loesken, DVM5,
  8. Elisabeth Okholm Nielsen, DVM, PhD7,
  9. Merel Postma, DVM, PhD, DipECVPH4,
  10. Marie Sjölund, DVM, PhD3,8,
  11. Katharina D C Stärk, DrMedVet, PhD, DipECVPH, MRCVS1,9 and
  12. Catherine Belloc, DVM, PhD, DipECPHM6
  1. 1SAFOSO AG, Liebefeld, Switzerland
  2. 2LUNAM Université, Oniris, INRA, Nantes, France
  3. 3Department of Clinical Sciences, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden
  4. 4Veterinary Epidemiology Unit, Department of Reproduction, Obstetrics and Herd Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Salisburylaan, Merelbeke, Belgium
  5. 5Field Station for Epidemiology, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Bakum, Germany
  6. 6BIOEPAR, INRA, Oniris, Nantes, France
  7. 7Danish Agriculture & Food Council, Pig Research Centre, Copenhagen, Denmark
  8. 8Department of Animal Health and Antimicrobial Strategies, National Veterinary Institute, Uppsala, Sweden
  9. 9Department of Pathobiology and Population Sciences, Royal Veterinary College, Hawkshead, UK
  1. E-mail for correspondence; catherine.belloc{at}oniris-nantes.fr

Abstract

Pig farmers are strongly encouraged to reduce their antimicrobial usage because of the rising threat from antimicrobial resistance. However, such efforts should not compromise the herd health status and performance. This study aimed to describe the profile of so-called ‘top-farms’ that managed to combine both high technical performance and low antimicrobial usage. A cross-sectional study was conducted among 227 farrow-to-finish farms in Belgium, France, Germany and Sweden. Among them, 44 farms were allocated to the top-farms group and were compared with the ’regular’ farms group in terms of farm characteristics, biosecurity and health status. Top-farms had fewer gastrointestinal symptoms in suckling pigs and fewer respiratory symptoms in fatteners, which could partly explain their reduced need for antimicrobials and higher performance. They also had higher biosecurity and were located in sparsely populated pig areas. However, 14 farms of the top-farms group were located in densely populated pig areas, but still managed to have low usage and high technical performance; they had higher internal biosecurity and more extensive vaccination against respiratory pathogens. These results illustrate that it is possible to control infectious diseases using other approaches than high antimicrobial usage, even in farms with challenging environmental and health conditions.

  • antibiotics
  • biosecurity
  • health management

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • Funding This work was funded by EMIDA ERA-net and the RESPICARE grant of the Institut Carnot Santé Animale.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.