Article Text

other Versions

PDF
Evaluation of three intravenous injectable anaesthesia protocols in healthy adult male alpacas
  1. Sandra D Taylor, PhD1,
  2. Aubrey N Baird, MS1,
  3. Ann B Weil, MS1 and
  4. Audrey Ruple, MS, PhD2
  1. 1Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA
  2. 2Department of Comparative Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA
  1. E-mail for correspondence, Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Purdue University, 625 Harrison St, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA; taylo248{at}purdue.edu

Abstract

Few studies have investigated the effects of intravenous injectable anaesthesia in alpacas. The objective of this study was to evaluate three intravenous injectable anaesthesia protocols in healthy adult alpacas exposed to noxious stimulation. A prospective randomised crossover study was done using six healthy adult male alpacas. Cardiopulmonary variables including heart rate, respiratory rate, mean arterial pressure, end-tidal pCO2 and haemoglobin oxygen saturation were collected immediately after and every two minutes following induction of each of three anaesthesia protocols in six male castrated alpacas. A hoof tester was used to apply consistent pressure every two minutes after induction and the response was recorded. Time from induction to muscle contraction and leg withdrawal were recorded, as well as time from induction to extubation, sternal recumbency and standing. There was no significant difference in duration of anaesthesia or cardiopulmonary variables among the three anaesthesia protocols. Total duration of anaesthesia was approximately 20 minutes for each protocol. Hypoxaemia and mild hypercarbia were common among all protocols. Induction and recovery scores were excellent.

  • alpaca
  • anaesthesia
  • propofol
  • hypoxaemia
  • Received August 25, 2016.
  • Revision received July 13, 2017.
  • Accepted July 24, 2017.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

  • Received August 25, 2016.
  • Revision received July 13, 2017.
  • Accepted July 24, 2017.
View Full Text

Footnotes

  • Funding This work was supported by Leslie Herzog, Herzog Alpacas, through the Alpaca Research Foundation.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.