Article Text

The use of PRID-Delta versus CIDR in dairy cattle and subsequent pregnancy rate with artificial insemination
  1. Hannah Doit and
  2. Natalie Robinson
  1. CEVM, University of Nottingham

Statistics from

Clinical scenario

Farmer Smith has a block calving dairy herd. Your colleague has always visited the farm six weeks into the breeding season to synchronise any cows that haven't yet been inseminated, using a progesterone-based protocol. This year, as your colleague is away, you visit the farm and take with you packets of PRID-Delta (Ceva Animal Health). On seeing the packets of PRID-Delta, Farmer Smith looks horrified and explains that your colleague always uses CIDR (Zoetis). You reassure Farmer Smith that they contain the same active ingredient and he agrees to let you continue as long as you are sure that the cows will still get in calf just as well. As you drive back to the practice you wonder whether you should have been so confident.

The question

In [dairy cattle] does the use of [PRID versus CIDR for oestrus synchronisation] result in a greater improvement in the [subsequent pregnancy rate from artificial insemination]?

Search strategy

The search strategy can be viewed at, it is also available as …

View Full Text

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.