Article Text

PDF
Consultation of pig farmers on the inclusion of some welfare outcome assessments within UK farm assurance
  1. S. Mullan, BVMS, DWEL, MRCVS1,
  2. A. Butterworth, BSc, BVSc, PhD, CertWel, CBiol, MIBiol, MRCVS1,
  3. H. R. Whay, BSc, PhD1,
  4. S. Edwards, MA, PhD2 and
  5. D. C. J. Main, BVetMed, PhD, CertVR, DWEL, MRCVS1
  1. 1 Department of Clinical Veterinary Science, University of Bristol, Langford House, Langford, North Somerset BS40 5DU
  2. 2 School of Agriculture, Food and Rural Development, University of Newcastle, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RX
  1. E-mail for correspondence: siobhan.mullan{at}bris.ac.uk

Abstract

Fifty-six pig farmers who attended a series of health seminars completed a questionnaire to assess their attitude to the inclusion of some welfare outcome assessments within farm assurance. In answer to open questions, farmers were most commonly proud of the productivity (27.5 per cent) and welfare (23.5 per cent) of the pigs on their farm, and the welfare of pigs in the UK industry as a whole (26.1 per cent). The most common thing that farmers wanted to tell consumers about was the welfare of the pigs (55.8 per cent), followed by their stockmanship qualities, the quality of their pig meat and the safety of their pig meat (all 13.5 per cent). In answer to closed questions, 66 per cent of farmers stated they would be either quite willing or very willing to perform welfare self-assessments as part of farm assurance, and 66 per cent would be quite or very willing to be anonymously benchmarked on the welfare of their pigs.

    Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Request permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.