Article Text

PDF
Comparison of a standard and a detailed postmortem protocol for detecting Mycobacterium bovis in badgers
  1. T. R. Crawshaw, BVetMed, MSc, MRCVS1,
  2. I. B. Griffiths, BVetMed, MSc, FRCPath, MRCVS2 and
  3. R. S. Clifton-Hadley, MA, VetMB, PhD, MSc, MRCVS3
  1. 1 Veterinary Laboratories Agency (VLA) — Starcross, Staplake Mount, Starcross, Exeter, Devon EX6 8PE
  2. 2 VLA — Bury St Edmunds, Rougham Hill, Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk IP33 2RX
  3. 3 VLA — Weybridge, Woodham Lane, New Haw, Addlestone, Surrey KT15 3NB

Abstract

A standard postmortem protocol, consisting of gross pathology, culture for mycobacteria and limited selective histopathology, was used in the randomised badger culling trial in Great Britain to detect Mycobacterium bovis infection. This standard protocol was compared with a more detailed protocol in which more tissues were examined grossly, more tissues were cultured, more culture slopes were seeded, the culture period was extended and tissues were examined routinely by histopathology. The standard protocol was more sensitive in badgers with gross visible lesions than in badgers with no gross visible lesions. When applied to the study population of badgers, the overall sensitivity of the standard protocol relative to the more detailed protocol was estimated to be 54·6 per cent (95 per cent confidence interval 44·9 to 69·8 per cent). Badgers with tuberculosis (tb) detected by the standard protocol had a mean of 7·6 tissues with microscopic lesions suspicious of tb. The additional badgers detected by the detailed protocol had a mean of 4·4 tissues with microscopic lesions suspicious of tb.

    Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Request permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.