Article Text

Comparison of xylazine, lidocaine and the two drugs combined for modified dorsolumbar epidural anaesthesia in cattle
  1. I. Lee, DVM, MS, PhD,
  2. Y. Ayukawa, DVM,
  3. N. Sasaki, DVM, PhD,
  4. H. Yamada, DVM, PhD1,
  5. N. Yamagishi, DVM, PhD and
  6. K. Oboshi, DVM, PhD2
  1. 1 Department of Clinical Veterinary Science
  2. 2 Research Centre for Animal Hygiene and Food Safety, School of Veterinary Medicine, Obihiro University of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine, Inada, Obihiro, Hokkaido 080-8555, Japan


Twenty-four Holstein cattle scheduled for flank surgery in a standing position were randomly assigned to four groups of six. A 16 G, 120 mm Tuohy needle was inserted into the first interlumbar epidural space and its position was confirmed by the hanging drop technique. After air had been allowed to enter freely for approximately one minute, the epidural needle was slowly inserted 7 to 10 mm deeper to penetrate the epidural fat, and anaesthetic solution containing either 0˙05 mg/kg bodyweight xylazine hydrochloride (xylazine), 0˙025 mg/kg xylazine, 0˙025 mg/kg xylazine and 0˙1 mg/kg lidocaine hydrochloride (lidocaine), or 0˙2 mg/kg lidocaine alone was administered. Signs of sedation were observed in the three groups treated with xylazine and the number of spinal segments involved in the area of analgesia when the anaesthetic contained xylazine was significantly greater than with 0˙2 mg/kg lidocaine alone (P<0˙01). After the treatment with 0˙025 mg/kg xylazine and 0˙1 mg/kg lidocaine, flank surgery was performed successfully without additional line block or side effects.

Statistics from

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.