Article Text

PDF
Status of wildlife health monitoring in the United Kingdom
  1. A. W. Sainsbury, BVetMed,CertLAS, CertZooMed,MRCVS1,
  2. P. M. Bennett, DPhil1,
  3. A. A. Cunningham, BVSc,PhD, MRCVS1 and
  4. J. K. Kirkwood, BVSc,PhD, MRCVS2
  1. 1 Institute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London, Regent's Park, London NWI 4RY
  2. 2 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare, The Old School, Brewhouse Hill, Wheathampstead, Hertfordshire AL4 8AN

Abstract

There is a clear need to monitor the health of wildlife in the UK, to help to understand the population dynamics of endangered species and to detect any harm to the welfare of wild animals caused by human beings. Despite previous proposals, there has been little progress in the development of a national programme of monitoring. With notable exceptions, the current schemes for investigating the morbidity and mortality of wild animals cover only limited groups of animals and are fragmented and uncoordinated. They consist of statutory schemes of restricted scope, and studies in universities, institutes and wildlife rehabilitation centres with limited funding. As a result, significant disease incidents may remain undetected and others may not be investigated fully, posing risks to the welfare and conservation of wildlife, the welfare of domestic animals, and in some cases to human health. Coordinated national schemes for the surveillance of the health of wildlife are already established in France, the USA and Canada and their best characteristics could be used to develop a scheme for the UK.

    Statistics from Altmetric.com

      Request permissions

      If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.