Veterinary Record 104:332-334 doi:10.1136/vr.104.15.332
  • Papers & Articles

Comparison of two infectious bursal disease vaccine strains: efficacy and potential hazards in susceptible and maternally immune birds


Two infectious bursal disease vaccines were administered to separate groups of maternally immune and susceptible chickens at various ages. Vaccine B caused no damage to the bursae of chickens examined histologically at nine and 20 days after vaccination. The bursae of chickens given vaccine A were shown to be severely damaged when similarly examined. Both vaccines protected all the susceptible groups against challenge, but only vaccine A protected the groups of maternally immune chickens. Susceptible chickens vaccinated at one day of age with vaccine A showed a lowered response to Hitchner B1 Newcastle disease vaccine given at 14 days of age, judged by the haemagglutination-inhibition response and Newcastle disease challenge. The performance of the Newcastle disease vaccine was not affected in chickens given vaccine B. Bedding used by birds given vaccine A was shown to be capable of transmitting vaccinal virus to susceptible chickens, causing severe bursal damage.

    Sign up for job alerts

    Vet Record Careers features a comprehensive database of vet jobs.
    Browse for your next job, or set personalised job alerts so you hear about vacancies as soon as they go online.
    Find out more at Vet Record Careers

    Free Sample Issue

    This recent issue is free to all users to allow everyone the opportunity to see the full scope and typical content of the Veterinary Record.
    View free sample issue >>

    Navigate This Article